After spending a fair amount of time in the early morning walking about six months ago, I was ambling along minding my own business, to the extent that travel at just over 3.5 mph will allow, when I noticed something that at the time seemed really quite peculiar. It's captured in this morning's photograph of the National Gallery. See if you can pick out anything that's out of the ordinary.
 |
National Gallery just after sunrise this morning |
Of course the architecture is striking...particularly if you are partial to the Greek revival style that seems to dominate the Federal Government buildings in the more historic parts of Washington, DC. That's not all that unusual if you've followed some of my previous postings. There is a hint of a mostly clear sunrise with salmon clouds backed by a cerulean sky, but again, this has been a rather beautiful, though typical, occurrence.
What I noticed six months ago, and is aptly but not obviously demonstrated by this photo is the large percentage of women out exercising in the early morning. There are six people in this photo. Five are women, and all five are engaged in the overly vigorous (in my quickly becoming and old man opinion) activity of running the stairs. The one male is dressed for work and trudging up the steps at a much more civilized pace (again, just my perspective from where I stand as far as the speed part of that assessment goes.
Upon my initial observation (in the depths of winter, by the way), I thought that I'd stumbled on an interesting, but non-recurring anomaly. The apparent imbalance in the ratio at the time was striking enough that I decided to actually start taking metrics the following morning. The need for numbers to disprove this clearly erroneous impression scratched the itch of the engineering degree that I took in university a couple of decades ago.
The metrics collection exercise was pretty simple. For the set of humans that were clearly out on the Mall in Washington, DC exercising in the early morning, I would count the number of males and number of females I encountered during my walk starting a the entrance to the Capitol campus, around the loop that I walked on the Mall, and ending with my exit of the Capitol campus approximately two miles later.
I collected the numbers for a little longer than a week, and reported the results to Rory Conlan on nearly a daily basis, but after the first several days it was clear that my initial impression that struck like a bolt from the blue was clearly supported by the data. Ten or twelve days later when I'd convinced myself that my observation was no mere anomaly, the ratio of females to males in a relatively safe place for taking exercise worked out to about 3.5 to 1.
I took the same series of metrics during the lunch time period, and it became clear that there was a much different ratio that was much closer to parity, but favored males over females in terms of numbers just slightly.
Rory and I concluded that the ratio was skewed heavily toward the female of the species in the early morning period for two principle reasons:
1. The women were tougher and more dedicated. Remember, this was in February, and there were several mornings when the temperature was in the low to mid-teens and the wind was blowing like it had forgotten to turn off the oven in Mexico and was rushing back from Canada to finish the task.
2. Grooming habits and social expectations indicated that early exercise afforded the women the opportunity to put in the miles and still be coiffed appropriately for their professional engagements for the remainder of the day.
Observed at other locations in diverse areas of the country, this observation, up to and including the specific ratios, appears to hold true where I've taken the data. This is yet another aspect of early morning activity that I find enriching and positive. Put yourself in the way of beauty and then be conscious enough of the moment to see it traipse through your life.